
In industrial automation and control systems, two communication protocols stand out: CANopen and DeviceNet. Both are built upon the Controller Area Network (CAN) protocol, yet they exhibit distinct characteristics and are utilized in different industrial applications. To understand their differences and similarities, it's essential to delve into the OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) model and how these protocols fit within its framework.
OSI Model Overview
The OSI (Open Systems Interconnection) model is a conceptual framework that standardizes the functions of a telecommunication or computing system into seven distinct layers. Each layer serves specific functions and interacts with adjacent layers to ensure seamless communication across a network.


Here's a detailed overview of the OSI model layers:
- Physical Layer: This layer deals with the physical transmission of data over the network medium. It defines the electrical, mechanical, and procedural aspects of data transmission, including cable types, connectors, and signal modulation.
- Data Link Layer: The Data Link Layer ensures reliable data transfer between adjacent nodes in a network. It handles error detection and correction, framing, and flow control to maintain data integrity and proper sequencing of frames.
- Network Layer: The Network Layer manages routing and addressing within the network. It establishes logical paths (routes) for data packets to reach their destination, handles congestion control, and performs routing decisions based on network topology and protocols.
- Transport Layer: The Transport Layer provides end-to-end communication services between applications. It ensures data reliability, flow control, and error recovery mechanisms such as acknowledgments and retransmissions. Common transport layer protocols include TCP (Transmission Control Protocol) and UDP (User Datagram Protocol).
- Session Layer: The Session Layer establishes, maintains, and terminates connections between applications. It manages sessions or dialogues between devices, synchronizes data exchange, and handles session checkpointing and recovery in case of interruptions.
- Presentation Layer: The Presentation Layer handles data translation, encryption, and compression to ensure compatibility between different systems. It deals with data formatting, code conversion, and data encryption for secure transmission and interoperability.
- Application Layer: The Application Layer supports application-level functions and user interactions. It provides services such as file transfer, email communication, web browsing, and network management applications. Protocols like HTTP, FTP, SMTP, and SNMP operate at this layer.
DeviceNet: A Protocol for Industrial Networks
DeviceNet, developed by Allen-Bradley (now part of Rockwell Automation), is another protocol built on top of CAN but with a focus on industrial networking and device-level communication. It operates primarily at the lower layers of the OSI model (Layers 1-2) and is often used for sensor and actuator networks in manufacturing environments. Key aspects of DeviceNet include:
- Plug-and-Play Connectivity: Simplifies device installation and configuration through standardized connectors and automatic address assignment.
- Device-Level Messaging: Enables efficient communication between sensors, actuators, and controllers for process control and monitoring.
- Deterministic Communication: Offers predictable and reliable data exchange, crucial for time-critical applications in industrial automation.
- Scalability: Supports network expansion by adding new devices without significant reconfiguration or performance degradation.
DeviceNet's communication relies heavily on the physical layer, particularly the type of cable used and its length. According to RealPars, the length of the cable directly affects the data rates achievable in a DeviceNet network. Shorter cables generally support higher data rates, while longer cables may result in lower data rates due to signal attenuation and transmission delays.
This aspect is crucial for engineers and system designers working with DeviceNet networks, as they need to consider the cable length limitations to ensure optimal performance and reliable communication within the network.
CANopen: A Comprehensive Communication Protocol
CANopen is a higher-layer protocol based on CAN, primarily operating at the upper layers of the OSI model (Layers 5-7). It is designed for real-time, distributed control applications, making it suitable for industrial automation, medical devices, and transportation systems. Here are some key features of CANopen:
- Object-Oriented Communication: Utilizes a structured object dictionary to define device parameters, functions, and communication objects.
- Standardized Communication Profiles: Offers predefined communication profiles for different device types, simplifying device integration and interoperability.
- Multi-Master Support: Allows multiple nodes (devices) to act as masters, facilitating decentralized control architectures.
- Time-Triggered Communication: Supports synchronous and asynchronous communication modes, enabling precise timing for critical applications.
Comparative Analysis
When comparing CANopen and DeviceNet, several factors come into play:
Feature | CANopen | DeviceNet |
Application Focus | Complex, distributed control systems | Device-level applications, plug-and-play |
Communication Overhead | Higher due to object-oriented approach | Lower, streamlined messaging |
Number of Supported Devices/Nodes |
Up to 127 |
Up to 64 |
Interoperability | Enhanced with standardized profiles | Tightly integrated with Rockwell Automation |
Communication Layers | Layers 5-7 (Session, Presentation, Application) | Layers 1-2 (Physical, Data Link) |
Multi-Master Support | Yes | No (Master-Slave architecture) |
Deterministic Communication | Yes (Time-Triggered modes) | Yes (Deterministic messaging) |
Device Integration | Extensive configuration and device integration | Plug-and-play connectivity |
Scalability | Suitable for large networks | Suitable for smaller, expandable networks |
Complexity vs. Simplicity | More complex setup and configuration | Simpler setup, easier deployment |
This table provides a concise comparison of key features and characteristics between CANopen and DeviceNet, aiding in understanding their differences and suitability for various industrial applications.
Conclusion
Both CANopen and DeviceNet leverage the robustness of the CAN protocol while addressing specific needs within the industrial automation landscape.
CANopen caters to complex control systems requiring extensive configurability and real-time communication, while DeviceNet excels in simpler, device-centric applications with a focus on plug-and-play functionality.
Understanding the nuances of these protocols and their alignment with the OSI model can guide engineers and system integrators in selecting the most suitable solution for their projects.
This article is original content created and posted by Electromate. Please do not re-post this content without prior approval from Electromate.